LIC’s Jeevan ANURAG is a with profits plan specifically designed to take care of the educational needs of children. The plan can be taken by a parent on his or her own life. Benefits under the plan are payable at prespecified durations irrespective of whether the Life Assured survives to the end of the policy term or dies during the term of the policy. In addition, this plan also provides for an immediate payment of Basic Sum Assured amount on death of the Life Assured during the term of the policy.
Assured Benefit
Payment of 20% of the Basic Sum Assured at the start of every year during last 3 policy years before maturity. At maturity, 40% of the Basic Sum Assured along with reversionary bonuses declared from time to time on full Sum Assured for the full term and the Terminal bonus, if any shall be payable. For example, if term of the policy is 20 years, 20% of the Sum assured will be payable at the end of the 17th,18th, 19th year and 40% of the Sum Assured along with the reversionary bonuses and the terminal bonus, if any, at the end of the 20th year.
Death Benefit
Payment of an amount equal to Sum Assured under the basic plan immediately on the death of the life assured.
Saturday, September 22, 2007
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA (LICI) `Agent
| Job Function | : | Sales/Business Development |
| Specialization | : | Direct/Commission Sales |
| Industry | : | Insurance |
| Qualification | : | School & Graduation - Any Graduate |
| Experience | : | 0 -5 |
| Level | : | FULL OR PART TIME |
| Location | : | WEST BENGAL (Kolkata) |
| Key Skills | : | GOOD COMUNICATION, HIGH AMBITION, POSITIVE THINKING AND ATTITUDE |
| JOB DESCRIPTION : | |
| CAN EARN RS 15000/- PER MONTH BYSALING AND MARKETING INSURANCE CONCEPT OF INDIA`S LARGEST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ie LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, THE ONLY GOVT INSURANCE COMPANY WITH GOVT ASUURANCE. LICI IS NO 1 MOST TRUSTED SERVICE BRAND OF TOP 50 COMPANY BY ECCONOMIC TIMES. ON SALE OF INSURANCE POLICIES AGENT`S COMMISSION UP TO 25% COMMISSION ON PREMIUM PLUS 40% BONUS ON PREMIUM. CAN EARN AT LEAST RS 15000/- MONTH WITH GRATUITY ,MEDICAL BENEFIT,PERSONAL LOAN, CAR, BIKE , HOME LOAN PAYABLE TO LICI AGENT. AND MANY MORE BENEFITS AVAILABLE. LICENCE ISSUED BY INSURANCE REGULARITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(IRDA) HOUSE WIFE, STUDENT,VRS, CA, SPOUSE OF GOVT EMPLOYEE CAN JOIN AS PART OR FULL TIME. | |
Friday, September 21, 2007
how to find the best company for auto loans???
how to find the best company for auto loans???
to find best company for autoloans there are certain criterias to be considered:-
- the most important and valuable think to check is interest rates of different company
- to check interest rates of different loan company you can search online company wise or common search
- as soon as you collect all the datas of interest rates of different loan companies you should make acomparison chart
- as you know already by yourself that company having the least interest rate will be chosen by you
- the next thing is to check out their demands of requirment and document process you have to go through
- now either call the company agent you liked or go there by yourself for details on their requirements .
- remember it make take more than a week to collect all the datas and verification by the loan company
- generally , company having least interest rates require much verification procedures
- last but not the least is to check out services of the company by your relatives or friends
- this is important because if somehow you missed to fill payto the company in the right time ( may be because of your financial problem)the company must have patience to wait for it and should not penalise you with certain amount.
Technorati Profile
Documents Required for Auto Insurance Claim in india
Documents Required for Auto Insurance Claim in india
For Accident Claims
1.Claim form duly signed
2.RC copy of the vehicle
3.Driving license copy
4.FIR on a case-to-case basis
5.Original estimate
6.Original repair invoice, payment receipt from the service center
For Third Party Claims:
1.Claim form duly signed
2.Police FIR copy
3.Driving license copy
4.RC copy of the vehicle
5.RTO transfer papers duly signed, mentioning that the vehicle cannot be located
publisher should not be held responsible for any change of the terms and condition .
it is advised that you must confirm it before any furthur step
car insurance
car insurance
Car insurance is the automobile insurance which is purchased by consumers (mostly) for their personal four-wheeler vehicles to ensure protection against losses caused due to traffic accidents, theft, fire damage, and other factors.
it is mandatory rule in most of the countries of the world
The insurance premium can be mandated either by the government or by the insurance company (in accordance to government regulations). The premium can vary depending on diverse factors which could affect the expected price of future claims, including:
• nature of usage of the car
• nature of the selected coverage
• vehicle features/ characteristics
• nature of the selected coverage
• profile of the driver (like age, gender, driving history, etc.)
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Structured settlement
A structured settlement is a financial or insurance arrangement, including periodic payments, that a claimant accepts to resolve a personal injury tort claim or to compromise a statutory periodic payment obligation. Structured settlements were first utilized in Canada and the United States during the 1970s as an alternative to lump sum settlements. Structured settlements are now part of the statutory tort law of several common law countries including: Australia, Canada, England and the United States. Although some uniformity exists, each of these countries has its own definitions, rules and standards for structured settlement. Structured settlements may include income tax and spendthrift requirements as well as benefits. Structured settlement payments are sometimes called “periodic payments”. A structured settlement incorporated into a trial judgment is called a “periodic payment judgment”.
Structured Settlements in the United States
The United States has enacted structured settlement laws and regulations at both the federal and state levels. Federal structured settlement laws include sections of the Federal Internal Revenue Code. State structured settlement laws include structured settlement protection statutes and periodic payment of judgment statutes. Medicaid and Medicare laws and regulations impact structured settlements. To preserve a claimant’s Medicare and Medicaid benefits, structured settlement payments may be incorporated into “Medicare Set Aside Arrangements” the “Special Needs Trusts”.
Definitions
The United States definition of “structured settlement” for Federal income taxation purposes, found in Internal Revenue Code Section 5891(c)(1), is an "arrangement" that meets the following requirements:
A structured settlement must be established by:
A suit or agreement for periodic payment of damages excludable from gross income under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(2); or
An agreement for the periodic payment of compensation under any workers’ compensation law excludable under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(1); and
The periodic payments must be of the character described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of Internal Revenue Code Section 130(c)(2) and must be payable by a person who:
Is a party to the suit or agreement or to a workers' compensation claim; or
By a person who has assumed the liability for such periodic payments under a Qualified Assignment in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 13
Legal Structure
The typical structured settlement arises and is structured as follows: An injured party (the claimant) settles a tort suit with the defendant (or its insurance carrier) pursuant to a settlement agreement that provides that, in exchange for the claimant's securing the dismissal of the lawsuit, the defendant (or, more commonly, its insurer) agrees to make a series of periodic payments over time. The insurer, a property/casualty insurance company, thus finds itself with a long-term payment obligation to the claimant. To fund this obligation, the property/casualty insurer generally takes one of two typical approaches: It either purchases an annuity from a life insurance company (an arrangement called a "buy and hold" case) or it assigns (or, more properly, delegates) its periodic payment obligation to a third party which in turn purchases an annuity (which arrangement is called an "assigned case").
In an unassigned case, the property/casualty insurer retains the periodic payment obligation and funds it by purchasing an annuity from a life insurance company, thereby offsetting its obligation with a matching asset. The payment stream purchased under the annuity matches exactly, in timing and amounts, the periodic payments agreed to in the settlement agreement. The property/casualty company owns the annuity and names the claimant as the payee under the annuity, thereby directing the annuity issuer to send payments directly to the claimant. If any of the periodic payments are life-contingent (i.e., the obligation to make a payment is contingent on someone continuing to be alive), then the claimant (or whoever is determined to be the measuring life) is named as the annuitant or measuring life under the annuity.
In an assigned case, the property/casualty company does not wish to retain the long-term periodic payment obligation on its books. Accordingly, the property/casualty insurer transfers the obligation, through a legal device called a qualified assignment, to a third party. The third party, called an assignment company, will require the property/casualty company to pay it an amount sufficient to enable it to buy an annuity that will fund its newly accepted periodic payment obligation. If the claimant consents to the transfer of the periodic payment obligation (either in the settlement agreement or, failing that, in a special form of qualified assignment known as a qualified assignment and release), the defendant and/or its property/casualty company has no further liability to make the periodic payments. This method of substituting the obliger is desirable for property/casualty companies that do not want to retain the periodic payment obligation on their books. Typically, an assignment company is an affiliate of the life insurance company from which the annuity is purchased.
An assignment is said to be "qualified" if it satisfies the criteria set forth in Internal Revenue Code Section 130 [1]. Qualification of the assignment is important to assignment companies because without it the amount they receive to induce them to accept periodic payment obligations would be considered income for federal income tax purposes. If an assignment qualifies under Section 130, however, the amount received is excluded from the income of the assignment company. This provision of the tax code was enacted to encourage assigned cases; without it, assignment companies would owe federal income taxes but would typically have no source from which to make the payments.
Definitions
The United States definition of “structured settlement” for Federal income taxation purposes, found in Internal Revenue Code Section 5891(c)(1), is an "arrangement" that meets the following requirements:
A structured settlement must be established by:
A suit or agreement for periodic payment of damages excludable from gross income under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(2); or
An agreement for the periodic payment of compensation under any workers’ compensation law excludable under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(1); and
The periodic payments must be of the character described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of Internal Revenue Code Section 130(c)(2) and must be payable by a person who:
Is a party to the suit or agreement or to a workers' compensation claim; or
By a person who has assumed the liability for such periodic payments under a Qualified Assignment in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 13
Legal Structure
The typical structured settlement arises and is structured as follows: An injured party (the claimant) settles a tort suit with the defendant (or its insurance carrier) pursuant to a settlement agreement that provides that, in exchange for the claimant's securing the dismissal of the lawsuit, the defendant (or, more commonly, its insurer) agrees to make a series of periodic payments over time. The insurer, a property/casualty insurance company, thus finds itself with a long-term payment obligation to the claimant. To fund this obligation, the property/casualty insurer generally takes one of two typical approaches: It either purchases an annuity from a life insurance company (an arrangement called a "buy and hold" case) or it assigns (or, more properly, delegates) its periodic payment obligation to a third party which in turn purchases an annuity (which arrangement is called an "assigned case").
In an unassigned case, the property/casualty insurer retains the periodic payment obligation and funds it by purchasing an annuity from a life insurance company, thereby offsetting its obligation with a matching asset. The payment stream purchased under the annuity matches exactly, in timing and amounts, the periodic payments agreed to in the settlement agreement. The property/casualty company owns the annuity and names the claimant as the payee under the annuity, thereby directing the annuity issuer to send payments directly to the claimant. If any of the periodic payments are life-contingent (i.e., the obligation to make a payment is contingent on someone continuing to be alive), then the claimant (or whoever is determined to be the measuring life) is named as the annuitant or measuring life under the annuity.
In an assigned case, the property/casualty company does not wish to retain the long-term periodic payment obligation on its books. Accordingly, the property/casualty insurer transfers the obligation, through a legal device called a qualified assignment, to a third party. The third party, called an assignment company, will require the property/casualty company to pay it an amount sufficient to enable it to buy an annuity that will fund its newly accepted periodic payment obligation. If the claimant consents to the transfer of the periodic payment obligation (either in the settlement agreement or, failing that, in a special form of qualified assignment known as a qualified assignment and release), the defendant and/or its property/casualty company has no further liability to make the periodic payments. This method of substituting the obliger is desirable for property/casualty companies that do not want to retain the periodic payment obligation on their books. Typically, an assignment company is an affiliate of the life insurance company from which the annuity is purchased.
An assignment is said to be "qualified" if it satisfies the criteria set forth in Internal Revenue Code Section 130 [1]. Qualification of the assignment is important to assignment companies because without it the amount they receive to induce them to accept periodic payment obligations would be considered income for federal income tax purposes. If an assignment qualifies under Section 130, however, the amount received is excluded from the income of the assignment company. This provision of the tax code was enacted to encourage assigned cases; without it, assignment companies would owe federal income taxes but would typically have no source from which to make the payments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
